[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081007142902.GA26302@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 18:29:02 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dada1@...mosbay.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:16:13AM -0500, Christoph Lameter (cl@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
> > I tested skb destruction via RCU path, and got 2.5 times worse numbers
> > with small-packets-bulk-transfer workload.
>
> Was this with regular RCU freeing? This will cool down the cacheline before
> frees. You need SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to keep the objects cache hot.
I believe there were no SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU 2 yars ago :)
It was pure call_rcu(&skb->rcu, real_skb_freeing), where
real_skb_freeing() just did usual kfree().
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists