2.6.26-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Thomas Gleixner commit d4496b39559c6d43f83e4c08b899984f8b8089b5 upstream The reprogramming of the periodic broadcast handler was broken, when the first programming returned -ETIME. The clockevents code stores the new expiry value in the clock events device next_event field only when the programming time has not been elapsed yet. The loop in question calculates the new expiry value from the next_event value and therefor never increases. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(v */ static void tick_handle_periodic_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev) { + ktime_t next; + tick_do_periodic_broadcast(); /* @@ -184,10 +186,13 @@ static void tick_handle_periodic_broadca /* * Setup the next period for devices, which do not have - * periodic mode: + * periodic mode. We read dev->next_event first and add to it + * when the event alrady expired. clockevents_program_event() + * sets dev->next_event only when the event is really + * programmed to the device. */ - for (;;) { - ktime_t next = ktime_add(dev->next_event, tick_period); + for (next = dev->next_event; ;) { + next = ktime_add(next, tick_period); if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, ktime_get())) return; -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/