[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48EBEE0B.6080009@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:17:31 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet
Hello, a bit of additions after some sleep.
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> IIRC, the original readdir implementation put a cursor entry to walk
> through the children list. The implementation was horribly broken in
> a number of different ways (ISTR problems with locking and multiple
> and different type of walkers) and I just gutted out all the
> complexity out and made it simple as getting it correct was far more
> important and there seemed to be little need for optimization.
>
> Yeah, using RCU sounds like a plan.
Heh... it did sound like a plan but I don't think the plan would solve
the problem. filldir can't be put in rcu read critical section. :-p
>> The revalidate on access model doesn't appear to have a way to track
>> remote renames. Something sysfs supports.
>
> Yeap, IIRC, one of the reasons why sysfs wasn't converted over to
> sysfs was because sysfs guarantees inode doesn't change over rename or
> move so that notifications keep working over renames.
s/over to sysfs/over to revalidation/ and s/inode/dentry/. Maybe we can
just ignore dnotify? :-(
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists