Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:05:52 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC] memcg: handle migration by charge-commit-cancel (was [PATCH
 3/6] memcg: charge-commit-cancel protocl

On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:57:34 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> For fixing this, I added a new interface.
>   - precharge
>    account to res_counter by PAGE_SIZE and try to free pages if necessary.
>   - commit	
>    register page_cgroup and add to LRU if necessary.
>   - cancel
>    uncharge PAGE_SIZE because of do_swap_page failure.
> 
> 
>      CPUA              
>   (1) charge (always)
>   (2) set page's rmap (mapcount > 0)
>   (3) commit charge was necessary or not after set_pte().
> 
> This protocol uses PCG_USED bit on page_cgroup for avoiding over accounting.
> Usual mem_cgroup_charge_common() does precharge -> commit at a time.
> 
> And this patch also adds following function to clarify all charges.
> 
>   - mem_cgroup_newpage_charge() ....replacement for mem_cgroup_charge()
> 	called against newly allocated anon pages.
> 
>   - mem_cgroup_charge_migrate_fixup()
>         called only from remove_migration_ptes().
> 	we'll have to rewrite this later.(this patch just keeps old behavior)
> 
> Good for clarify "what we does"
> 

Not tested yet but an idea for handling page migraion in better way.
How do you think ?

Now, management of "charge" under page migration is done under following
manner. (Assume migrate page contents from oldapge to newpage)

 Before
  - "newpage" is charged before migration.
 at success.
  - "oldpage" is uncharged at somewhere(unmap, radix-tree-replace)
 at failure
  - "newpage" is uncharged.
  - "oldpage" is charged if necessary (*1)

But (*1) is not trustable....because of GFP_ATOMIC and we need
special handler.

This patch tries to change behavior as following by
pre-charge/commit/cancel ops.

 Before
  - charge PAGE_SIZE (no target page)
 success
  - commit charge against "newpage".
 failure
  - commit charge against "oldpage".
    (PCG_USED bit works effectively to avoid double-counting)
  - if "oldpage" is obsolete, cancel charge of PAGE_SIZE.
  
I think this is much simpler and trustable.

This is based on "allocate all page_cgroup at boot" behavior.


Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   19 ++++-------
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 mm/migrate.c               |   42 ++++++++------------------
 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/mm/migrate.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+.orig/mm/migrate.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/mm/migrate.c
@@ -121,20 +121,6 @@ static void remove_migration_pte(struct 
 	if (!is_migration_entry(entry) || migration_entry_to_page(entry) != old)
 		goto out;
 
-	/*
-	 * Yes, ignore the return value from a GFP_ATOMIC mem_cgroup_charge.
-	 * Failure is not an option here: we're now expected to remove every
-	 * migration pte, and will cause crashes otherwise.  Normally this
-	 * is not an issue: mem_cgroup_prepare_migration bumped up the old
-	 * page_cgroup count for safety, that's now attached to the new page,
-	 * so this charge should just be another incrementation of the count,
-	 * to keep in balance with rmap.c's mem_cgroup_uncharging.  But if
-	 * there's been a force_empty, those reference counts may no longer
-	 * be reliable, and this charge can actually fail: oh well, we don't
-	 * make the situation any worse by proceeding as if it had succeeded.
-	 */
-	mem_cgroup_charge_migrate_fixup(new, mm, GFP_ATOMIC);
-
 	get_page(new);
 	pte = pte_mkold(mk_pte(new, vma->vm_page_prot));
 	if (is_write_migration_entry(entry))
@@ -382,9 +368,6 @@ static void migrate_page_copy(struct pag
 	anon = PageAnon(page);
 	page->mapping = NULL;
 
-	if (!anon) /* This page was removed from radix-tree. */
-		mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
-
 	/*
 	 * If any waiters have accumulated on the new page then
 	 * wake them up.
@@ -621,6 +604,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
 	struct page *newpage = get_new_page(page, private, &result);
 	int rcu_locked = 0;
 	int charge = 0;
+	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 
 	if (!newpage)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -630,24 +614,26 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
 		goto move_newpage;
 	}
 
-	charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page, newpage);
-	if (charge == -ENOMEM) {
-		rc = -ENOMEM;
-		goto move_newpage;
-	}
 	/* prepare cgroup just returns 0 or -ENOMEM */
-	BUG_ON(charge);
-
 	rc = -EAGAIN;
+
 	if (!trylock_page(page)) {
 		if (!force)
 			goto move_newpage;
 		lock_page(page);
 	}
 
+	/* precharge against new page */
+	charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page, &mem);
+	if (charge == -ENOMEM) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+	BUG_ON(charge);
+
 	if (PageWriteback(page)) {
 		if (!force)
-			goto unlock;
+			goto uncharge;
 		wait_on_page_writeback(page);
 	}
 	/*
@@ -700,7 +686,9 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get
 rcu_unlock:
 	if (rcu_locked)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-
+uncharge:
+	if (!charge)
+		mem_cgroup_end_migration(mem, page, newpage);
 unlock:
 	unlock_page(page);
 
@@ -716,8 +704,6 @@ unlock:
 	}
 
 move_newpage:
-	if (!charge)
-		mem_cgroup_end_migration(newpage);
 
 	/*
 	 * Move the new page to the LRU. If migration was not successful
Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ struct mm_struct;
 
 extern int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
 				gfp_t gfp_mask);
-extern int mem_cgroup_charge_migrate_fixup(struct page *page,
-				struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
 /* for swap handling */
 extern int mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		gfp_t gfp_mask, struct mem_cgroup **ptr);
@@ -60,8 +58,9 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
 	((cgroup) == mem_cgroup_from_task((mm)->owner))
 
 extern int
-mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
-extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
+mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup **ptr);
+extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+	struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage);
 
 /*
  * For memory reclaim.
@@ -94,12 +93,6 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_cache_charg
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int mem_cgroup_charge_migrate_fixup(struct page *page,
-					struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				gfp_t gfp_mask, struct mem_cgroup **ptr)
 {
@@ -143,12 +136,14 @@ static inline int task_in_mem_cgroup(str
 }
 
 static inline int
-mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
+mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup **ptr)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page)
+static inline void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+					struct page *oldpage,
+					struct page *newpage)
 {
 }
 
Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc8+/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -780,11 +780,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(stru
 /*
  * Before starting migration, account against new page.
  */
-int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
+int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup **ptr)
 {
 	struct page_cgroup *pc;
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
-	enum charge_type ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
@@ -795,43 +794,66 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct 
 	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
 		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
 		css_get(&mem->css);
-		if (PageCgroupCache(pc)) {
-			if (page_is_file_cache(page))
-				ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE;
-			else
-				ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM;
-		}
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	if (mem) {
-		ret = mem_cgroup_charge_common(newpage, NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
-			ctype, mem);
+		ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &mem);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
+		*ptr = mem;
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
 
 /* remove redundant charge if migration failed*/
-void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *newpage)
+void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+		struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
 {
+	struct page *target;
+	struct page_cgroup *pc;
+	enum charge_type ctype;
+
+	/* at migration success, oldpage->mapping is *always* NULL */
+	if (oldpage->mapping)
+		target = oldpage;
+	else
+		target = newpage;
+
+	if (PageAnon(target))
+		ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED;
+	else if (page_is_file_cache(target))
+		ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE;
+	else
+		ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM;
+
 	/*
-	 * At success, page->mapping is not NULL.
-	 * special rollback care is necessary when
-	 * 1. at migration failure. (newpage->mapping is cleared in this case)
-	 * 2. the newpage was moved but not remapped again because the task
-	 *    exits and the newpage is obsolete. In this case, the new page
-	 *    may be a swapcache. So, we just call mem_cgroup_uncharge_page()
-	 *    always for avoiding mess. The  page_cgroup will be removed if
-	 *    unnecessary. File cache pages is still on radix-tree. Don't
-	 *    care it.
+	 * Both of oldpage and newpage are still under lock_page().
+	 * Then, we don't have to care about race in radix-tree.
+	 * But we have to be careful that this page is unmapped or not.
 	 */
-	if (!newpage->mapping)
-		__mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(newpage,
-				MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_FORCE);
-	else if (PageAnon(newpage))
-		mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(newpage);
+	if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED) {
+		/*
+		 * 2 caes for !page_mapped().
+		 * 1. remove_migration_pte() cannot remap this again.
+		 *    because the page is zapped.
+		 * 2. remove_migration_pte() successfully mapped it but
+		 *    it's unmapped, now.
+		 */
+		if (!page_mapped(target)) {
+			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+			css_put(&mem->css);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+		
+	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(target);
+	/*
+	 * __mem_cgroup_commit_charge() check PCG_USED bit of page_cgroup.
+	 * So, double-counting is effectively avoided.
+	 */
+	__mem_cgroup_commit_charge(mem, pc, ctype);
 }
 
+
 /*
  * A call to try to shrink memory usage under specified resource controller.
  * This is typically used for page reclaiming for shmem for reducing side











--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists