linux-kernel - Re: linux-firmware patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:29:46 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Dave <kilroyd@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-firmware patches

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 19:36 +0100, Dave wrote:
> Should patches to add firmware to the linux-firmware tree (and not the
> main kernel) be sent to linux-kernel, or somewhere else? It wasn't
> mentioned in the [ANNOUNCE]*, and I haven't been able to find an
> example on list.
> 
> Just wanted to check before posting an 80k patch consisting of non-GPL
> binary files.

Patches with binary files are going to be hard -- probably best just to
commit to a git tree and ask me to pull. Or mail the files separately,
with the changes to the WHENCE file as a separate patch.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/