[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810082056.33382.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:56:33 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] ide: Implement disk shock protection support
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de> wrote:
> > Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de> wrote:
> >> Hi Bart,
> >>
> >> may I ask you to apply yet another inter-diff? This is in order to
> >> address three issues:
> >>
> >> 1. Make sure that no negative value is being passed to
> >> jiffies_to_msecs() in ide_park_show().
> >> 2. Drop the superfluous variable hwif in ide_special_rq().
> >> 3. Skip initialisation of task and tf in ide_special_rq() if we are not
> >> handling a (un)park request.
> >
> > Well, #3 should have been done differently because we donn't want to
> > check for REQ_(UN)?PARK_HEADS more often than is necessary.
>
> While preparing the backport to 2.6.27, it has just occurred to me that
> we need to clear the IDE_DFLAG_PARKED flag in ide_disk_pre_reset()
> because this flag must not be set after *any* sort of access to the
> device.
>
> So, here is yet another revised version of the inter-diff. Just don't
> hurry to apply in case I have an enlightening dream tonight and want to
> change something more ;-).
>
> Regards,
>
> Elias
>
> Signed-off-by: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
I merged this version into the original patch.
[ Since it seems that there were no more enlightening dreams... ;) ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists