linux-kernel - Re: e1000e: sporadic "hardware error"s with Intel 82563EB on Supermicro X7DB3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081008233630.53d26853@speedy>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:36:30 +0200
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	"Graham, David" <david.graham@...el.com>
Cc:	"Hillier, Gernot " 
	<IMCEAMAILTO-gernot+2Ehillier+40siemens+2Ecom@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	"Hockert, Jeff W" <jeff.w.hockert@...el.com>,
	"Graham, David" <david.graham@...el.com>
Subject: Re: e1000e: sporadic "hardware error"s with Intel 82563EB on
 Supermicro X7DB3

On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:25:49 -0700
"Graham, David" <david.graham@...el.com> wrote:

> Hi Gernot,
> 
> Thanks for reporting this issue. We have witnessed this in our labs too,
> only on platforms that have BMC management firmware. I'm very familiar
> with the problem, and believe that we have fixed it, though the
> application of the fix may not be simple. The problem is a result of
> improper synchronization between the platform FW and the e1000e driver
> when they attempt concurrent access to LAN resources, and fixes were
> made both on the driver side, and on the FW side. On some platforms a
> simple driver update resolves the problem, others require FW fixes too.
> 
> The 0.2.0 driver in 2.6.25 has no fixes for this problem, and so I am
> not surprised that you see it there. The first set of changes for this
> issue are already in the 0.3.3.3-k2 driver that you are still seeing the
> problem with on 2.6.26, so either those changes are not good, or your
> issue requires one of the additional fixes.
> 
> There have been further improvements made to the driver synchronization
> code since the 0.3.3.3-k2 driver, and it is possible that a newer driver
> would resolve the issue. It'd be good for us to know if that's the case.
> The driver version is not yet (AFAICS) upstream, but is already
> available in the standalone e1000e-0.4.1.7 driver on sourceforge.
> (google "sourceforge e1000e"). Would you be able to try that, as a first
> step ? 

Repeat rant heard from many users and vendors:
  Why does Intel continue to not do driver development in mainline kernel?
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/