[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0810090905570.18606@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:06:20 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] integrity
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:56 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > > The integrity-TPM-internal-kernel-interface.patch prereqs:
> > > TPM-update-char-dev-BKL-pushdown.patch
> > > TPM-num_opens-to-is_open-variable-change.patch
> > > TPM-rcu-locking.patch
> > > TPM-addition-of-pnp-remove.patch
> > > TPM-Fixed-tpm_release-timing.patch
> >
> > Where are these patches?
> >
> > i.e. are they in a tree? If so, which one? If not, they need to be
> > posted in this series.
> >
> >
> >
> > - James
>
> The TPM patches have not, as yet, been picked up.
>
> These TPM patches are base TPM changes, not really related to the
> integrity patches and certainly not dependent them. However the reverse
> is not true. The integrity-tpm-internal-kernel-interface patch is
> dependent on, at least, the TPM-rcu-locking patch.
Please repost the TPM patches, then.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists