| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20081008230219.GA8075@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 03:02:19 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: fsl_upm compile failure.
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:28:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Hi Anton,
> I tried reenabling CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM in the Fedora kernel
> today (currently on 2.6.27-rc9-git1), and got the error below.
>
> ERROR: "fsl_lbc_lock" [drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.ko] undefined!
Weird. It works for me with mpc836x_rdk_defconfig and
MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM=m...
Hm..
CC drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.mod.o
LD [M] drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.ko
Can you send me the .config file you use?
> It seems that this isn't exported to modules.
> diff below fixes this. (Not tested yet, the Fedora ppc
> builders are a little slow).
>
> Dave
>
> ---
>
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM can be built modular, but needs to
> use fsl_lbc_lock, which isn't currently exported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
> index 422c8fa..1c6c522 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <asm/fsl_lbc.h>
>
> spinlock_t fsl_lbc_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(fsl_lbc_lock);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsl_lbc_lock);
>
> struct fsl_lbc_regs __iomem *fsl_lbc_regs;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsl_lbc_regs);
But the patch looks obviously correct. Much thanks for catching this.
Though better option would be to uninline the fsl_upm_run_pattern()..
it is quite big anyway... Something like this:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_lbc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_lbc.h
index 303f548..af2b535 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_lbc.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_lbc.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
#define __ASM_FSL_LBC_H
#include <linux/types.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
struct fsl_lbc_bank {
@@ -228,7 +227,6 @@ struct fsl_lbc_regs {
};
extern struct fsl_lbc_regs __iomem *fsl_lbc_regs;
-extern spinlock_t fsl_lbc_lock;
/*
* FSL UPM routines
@@ -268,44 +266,7 @@ static inline void fsl_upm_end_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm)
cpu_relax();
}
-/**
- * fsl_upm_run_pattern - actually run an UPM pattern
- * @upm: pointer to the fsl_upm structure obtained via fsl_upm_find
- * @io_base: remapped pointer to where memory access should happen
- * @mar: MAR register content during pattern execution
- *
- * This function triggers dummy write to the memory specified by the io_base,
- * thus UPM pattern actually executed. Note that mar usage depends on the
- * pre-programmed AMX bits in the UPM RAM.
- */
-static inline int fsl_upm_run_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm,
- void __iomem *io_base, u32 mar)
-{
- int ret = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fsl_lbc_lock, flags);
-
- out_be32(&fsl_lbc_regs->mar, mar << (32 - upm->width));
-
- switch (upm->width) {
- case 8:
- out_8(io_base, 0x0);
- break;
- case 16:
- out_be16(io_base, 0x0);
- break;
- case 32:
- out_be32(io_base, 0x0);
- break;
- default:
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
- }
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fsl_lbc_lock, flags);
-
- return ret;
-}
+extern int fsl_upm_run_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm, void __iomem *io_base,
+ u32 mar);
#endif /* __ASM_FSL_LBC_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
index 422c8fa..d81297c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_lbc.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/fsl_lbc.h>
spinlock_t fsl_lbc_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(fsl_lbc_lock);
@@ -127,3 +128,43 @@ int fsl_upm_find(phys_addr_t addr_base, struct fsl_upm *upm)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsl_upm_find);
+
+/**
+ * fsl_upm_run_pattern - actually run an UPM pattern
+ * @upm: pointer to the fsl_upm structure obtained via fsl_upm_find
+ * @io_base: remapped pointer to where memory access should happen
+ * @mar: MAR register content during pattern execution
+ *
+ * This function triggers dummy write to the memory specified by the io_base,
+ * thus UPM pattern actually executed. Note that mar usage depends on the
+ * pre-programmed AMX bits in the UPM RAM.
+ */
+int fsl_upm_run_pattern(struct fsl_upm *upm, void __iomem *io_base, u32 mar)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fsl_lbc_lock, flags);
+
+ out_be32(&fsl_lbc_regs->mar, mar << (32 - upm->width));
+
+ switch (upm->width) {
+ case 8:
+ out_8(io_base, 0x0);
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ out_be16(io_base, 0x0);
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ out_be32(io_base, 0x0);
+ break;
+ default:
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fsl_lbc_lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsl_upm_run_pattern);
(This also adds missing linux/spinlock.h include to the fsl_lbc.c)
Anyhow, whatever approach you chose, feel free to add my:
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Then please resend the patch with added
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
^^ Kumar would apply the patch to his powerpc.git tree, powerpc-next branch.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists