[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081009045646.GB24560@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 06:56:46 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl, dipankar@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8
[fix up Thomas' address to not bounce]
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:33:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The attached patch (similar to one in -tip, but set up for mainline and
> tweaked to make stall-checking on by default) should get you a stack
> trace of any CPUs holding up RCU grace periods for more than about
> three seconds.
>
> On the off-chance that this helps.
It actually does. The stall detector makes the online echo return after three seconds,
although it's not 100% clear to me why.
here's the backtrace
RCU detected CPU 14 stall (t=4295149800/5928 jiffies)
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc9 #5
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff8025d188>] __rcu_pending+0x6e/0x1d9
[<ffffffff8025d329>] rcu_pending+0x36/0x6e
[<ffffffff8023b480>] update_process_times+0x37/0x5b
[<ffffffff8024be72>] tick_periodic+0x68/0x74
[<ffffffff8024be9f>] tick_handle_periodic+0x21/0x66
[<ffffffff8021bcd2>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8a/0xa8
[<ffffffff8020bfe6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
<EOI> [<ffffffff803adb39>] ? acpi_safe_halt+0x2b/0x3e
[<ffffffff803adbfa>] ? acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xae/0x102
[<ffffffff804ffdd6>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x70/0xa2
[<ffffffff8020a097>] ? cpu_idle+0x7e/0x9c
[<ffffffff805bef4a>] ? start_secondary+0x157/0x15c
Timer issue?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists