[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081009115407.GD6628@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:54:07 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl,
dipankar@...ibm.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Frédéric Weisbecker wrote:
> 2008/10/9 Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This is a tracing patch for Classic RCU, which creates an "rcu/rcucb"
> > file in debugfs. This patch can be handy when you need to work out
> > why RCU is refusing to end the current grace period.
> >
> > Reading from the file results in something like the following:
> >
> > rcu: cur=1129 completed=1128 np=0 s=0
> > 0,3,7
> > rcu_bh: cur=-287 completed=-287 np=0 s=0
> >
> > online: 0-7
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Why don't you use the ring-buffer tracing engine?
> You will really make your life better by putting it as a tracer in
> kernel/trace and by using the relevant API.
> That will avoid you to manage the debugfs things, the memory
> allocation, the buffer managment.....
Hello, Frédéric,
Well, one reason is that I didn't know about it. ;-)
Does it allow the user to trigger a one-shot trace? Right now, what
one does is:
cat /debug/rcu/rcucb
whenever one wants to see what RCU is up to. You really don't want to
see every new value, as that would generate hundreds of trace records
per second -- per CPU. What does the user do with the ring-buffer
tracing enging?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists