[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081009153546.GA6912@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:35:46 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: Improve the recv buffer allocation
scheme
* Rusty Russell (rusty@...tcorp.com.au) wrote:
> On Thursday 09 October 2008 06:34:59 Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > From: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
> >
> > If segmentation offload is enabled by the host, we currently allocate
> > maximum sized packet buffers and pass them to the host. This uses up
> > 20 ring entries, allowing us to supply only 20 packet buffers to the
> > host with a 256 entry ring. This is a huge overhead when receiving
> > small packets, and is most keenly felt when receiving MTU sized
> > packets from off-host.
>
> There are three approaches we should investigate before adding YA feature.
> Obviously, we can simply increase the number of ring entries.
Tried that, it didn't help much. I don't have my numbers handy, but
levelled off at about 512 and was a modest boost. It's still wasteful
to preallocate like that on the off-chance it's a large packet.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists