[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1223571036.11830.32.camel@nimitz>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:50:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>, jeremy@...p.org,
arnd@...db.de, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> there might be races as well, especially with proxy state - and
> current->flags updates are not serialized.
>
> So maybe it should be a completely separate flag after all? Stick it
> into the end of task_struct perhaps.
What do you mean by proxy state? nsproxy?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists