[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1223571381.17706.94.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:56:21 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86: trim ACPI sleep stack buffer
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:56 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > We've got:
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > static char temp_stack[10240];
> > #endif
> >
> > and:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > stack_start.sp = temp_stack + 4096;
> > #endif
> >
> > ..which suggests we use at most 4k of the stack?
>
> I guess someone (probably me) was "playing it safe" -- not exactly
> remembering if stack grows down or up. I guess it should be safe to
> change it... will do that.
> Pavel
I've already got a patch, I was just wondering if there was some obscure
architectural reason for it that I wasn't aware of.
x86: trim ACPI sleep stack buffer
x86_64 SMP suspend to RAM uses a 10k temporary stack for saving the
kernel state, but only 4k of it is used. Shrink it to 4k.
Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
diff -r 73d55a1b6c10 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c Wed Oct 08 14:48:45 2008 -0500
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c Thu Oct 09 11:51:54 2008 -0500
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
static unsigned long acpi_realmode;
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
-static char temp_stack[10240];
+static char temp_stack[4096];
#endif
/**
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists