[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081009174427.GB6912@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:44:27 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@...el.com>,
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, mingo@...e.hu, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0a/3] TXT: Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology
support for Linux - Overview
* Pavel Machek (pavel@...e.cz) wrote:
> Ok, I don't get it, why would I want to measure my kernel?
Trusted boot. There's always the double-edge sword w/ this. Clearly,
a requirement is that you don't just brick your own box, and have some
policy/mechanism for defining how you'd use trusted boot. I believe
that's all there w/ TXT patch (since it's mostly handled before kernel
boots, TXT kernel bit is just to help w/ handoff).
> I see why Disney would want to do that, but I don't see why we would
> want to help them.
>
> Plus, the fact that trusted mode is pretty much incompatible with
> s3/s4 makes it useless, right?
Why do you say that? Did you look at patch 3/3, see tboot_sleep().
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists