[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:39:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>, jeremy@...p.org,
arnd@...db.de, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
* Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > there might be races as well, especially with proxy state - and
> > current->flags updates are not serialized.
> >
> > So maybe it should be a completely separate flag after all? Stick it
> > into the end of task_struct perhaps.
>
> What do you mean by proxy state? nsproxy?
it's a concept: one task installing some state into another task (which
state must be restored after a checkpoint event), while that other task
is running. Such as a pi-futex state for example.
So a task can acquire state not just by its own doing, but via some
other task too.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists