[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:49:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] splice vs O_APPEND
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:46:00AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > >
> > > The thing is, the append-only attribute is absolutely useless without
> > > being able to depend on it. So in that sense I think the IS_APPEND
> > > issue is important, and I'm fine with your original proposal for that
> > > (except we don't need the IS_IMMUTABLE check).
> >
> > Heh. In the meantime, I had grown to hate that more complex patch.
> >
> > So because I do see your point with IS_APPEND (being different from
> > O_APPEND), but because I also think that O_APPEND itself is a gray and
> > murky area, I just committed the following. I doubt anybody will ever even
> > notice it, but while I think it's all debatable, we might as well debate
> > it with this in place. I do agree that it's "safer" behaviour.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I suspect this qualifies for stable kernels too. Stable team, can you
> please add this to your queue?
Queue for which kernel releases? .25, .26, and/or .27?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists