[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:37:29 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OF: new helper: of_parse_phandles_with_args()
> + for (i = 0; i < list_cells; cur_index++) {
> + const u32 *cells;
> + const phandle *phandle;
> +
> + phandle = list + i;
> + args = phandle + 1;
Rather than incrementing i, I would just use a running pointer "list"
and drop "i" totally. Not big deal tho.
> + /* one cell hole in the list = <>; */
> + if (!*phandle) {
> + if (cur_index == index)
> + return -ENOENT;
> + i++;
> + continue;
> + }
I don't totally understand the above. The 0 phandle terminates the list
or is just an empty slot in it ? In the later case, it might be more
readable to use goto to skip over down to the normal if (cur_index ==
index) break; and let it return via the normal if (!node) return -ENOENT
out of the loop.
Appart from that it's good and I'm fine with putting it in if you respin
despite being a bit late mostly because it's me who is later reviewing
there :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists