linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:57:34 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ibm.com>, Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect	checkpoint/restart
 to work

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the
>> checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be
>> aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful
>> as a "flexible CR todo list".
> 
> Cool, so everyone agrees the patch is useful!

Yes, definitively. It is a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/