[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081010175508.3d1ed2a4@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:55:08 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: libata: set queue SSD flag for SSD devices
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:05:28 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> In this specific patch, it'll do no harm at least since I very much
> doubt we'll see a false positive. And even if, the consequences wont
> be dire. But it does want the version check, of course.
>
also, is "is an ssd" the right question or is "doesn't have seek
latency" the right one?
(difference is.. well EMC boxes with lots of ram etc)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists