[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F100CA.2050600@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:38:50 +0400
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> No, we discussed this before -- we are outside of the transaction, thus
>> no GPE
>> activity could interfere with ec_check_ibf0.
>
> Ok, this is in the process context and we don't really expect to get an
> interrupt at this point, but what happens if the EC generates an event that's
> not related to any transiaction. Is that guaranteed to never happen?
Interrupt handler in this case can't cause a change to status register, thus our
read of it will not be affected by interrupt.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists