linux-kernel - [PATCH 26/85] ACPI: cpufreq, processor: Detect old BIOS, not supporting CPU freq on a recent CPU.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <910dfae298f7b3dae0e9a52736182a3b0559ca35.1223706853.git.len.brown@intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:35:46 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 26/85] ACPI: cpufreq, processor: Detect old BIOS,
 not supporting CPU freq on a recent CPU.

From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>

On Intel CPUs it is rather common and a good hint that BIOSes which do provide
_PPC func, but not the frequencies itself in _PSS function, are old and need
to be updated for CPU freq support.

Tell the user/vendor he has a BIOS/firmware problem.
Make use of FW_BUG interface to give vendors and users the ability to
automatically check with (or let linuxfirmwarekit do that):
dmesg |grep "Firmware Bug"

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 80c251e..242f814 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #endif
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 
 #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
@@ -334,7 +335,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
 
-
 	if (!pr || !pr->performance || !pr->handle)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -347,13 +347,25 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 
 	result = acpi_processor_get_performance_control(pr);
 	if (result)
-		return result;
+		goto update_bios;
 
 	result = acpi_processor_get_performance_states(pr);
 	if (result)
-		return result;
+		goto update_bios;
 
 	return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Having _PPC but missing frequencies (_PSS, _PCT) is a very good hint that
+	 * the BIOS is older than the CPU and does not know its frequencies
+	 */
+ update_bios:
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(pr->handle, "_PPC", &handle))){
+		if(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EST))
+			printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG "BIOS needs update for CPU "
+			       "frequency support\n");
+	}
+	return result;
 }
 
 int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/