linux-kernel - Re: [kerneloops] regression in 2.6.27 wrt "lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081012200004.GI10429@nb.net.home>
Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:00:04 +0200
From:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [kerneloops] regression in 2.6.27 wrt "lock_page" and the
	"hwclock" program

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:38:26AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I get the impression from the code that it really wants a "don't
> schedule me out" rather than "this is a lock".

 Yes, I think so.

> it can do better.

 Any suggestion how to nicely implement "don't schedule me out"?

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/