linux-kernel - Re: [linux-cifs-client] Fwd: [PATCH] Fix CIFS compilation with CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <524f69650810121338y4bd00ec2pd213f6d933209cbf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:38:46 -0500
From:	"Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
To:	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl,
	"linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org" 
	<linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cooldavid@...ldavid.org,
	"samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Fwd: [PATCH] Fix CIFS compilation with CONFIG_KEYS unset

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> It's your call, but if we're going to carry a temporary patch, then I'd
> prefer to just carry the one that adds the empty key_revoke definition.
> I don't think there's much benefit to changing the cifs code for this,
> but I don't feel very strongly about it either way...
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

There are probably various CIFS_UPCALL related ifdefs that could be
merged/shrunk - let's do this as a set later.


-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/