[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F20142.3070002@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:53:06 +0300
From: Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, srostedt@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
sandmann@...mi.au.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add support for userspace stacktraces in tracing/iter_ctrl
On 2008-10-12 16:31, Frédéric Weisbecker wrote:
> 2008/10/12 Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>:
>
>> +static int copy_stack_frame(const void __user *fp, struct stack_frame *frame)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fp, sizeof(*frame)))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = 1;
>> + pagefault_disable();
>> + if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(frame, fp, sizeof(*frame)))
>> + ret = 0;
>> + pagefault_enable();
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>
>
> Hello Török,
>
> I don't understand why you are using this pagefault disabling and
> atomic copy here.
> Wouldn't a simple copy_from_user actually take of this? You don't seem
> to be in atomic
> context.
>
Hello,
This function is called from ftrace, as such I could be holding a
spinlock. It can also be called from
__rwsem_do_wake, which takes a spinlock.
This code is from sysprof's copy_stack_frame. Maybe pagefault_disable()
is not needed.
Best regards,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists