[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081013133051.GL12131@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:30:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Phil Endecott <phil_wueww_endecott@...zphil.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention Intel Atom in Kconfig.cpu
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:18:48AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:28:06 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > "Phil Endecott" <phil_wueww_endecott@...zphil.org> writes:
> >
> > > Am I right in thinking that CONFIG_MCORE2 is the correct choice for
> > > an Intel Atom?
> >
> > No, Atom is completely different from a Core2.
> >
> > Right now 586 or 686 is a reasonable choice.
>
> actually 586 is completely wrong.
It is nearest in scheduling at least. You'll lose CMOV, but that's
not a big loss.
> Core2 instruction set with tune=generic is still the best to set.
Not sure that is true. These option are mostly for the compiler.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists