lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1223907778.5566.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:22:58 -0400
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptsas: remove pointless null check

On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 15:05 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> mptsas: remove unneeded check
> 
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> 
> >From coverity checker. Closes #9675
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-EWRONGLIST

This is a SCSI patch (although I admit with fusion sitting in
drivers/message it's hard to tell without looking in the MAINTAINERS
file).

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> index 12b7325..a9019f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> @@ -2279,9 +2279,8 @@ mptsas_delete_expander_phys(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
>  	mutex_lock(&ioc->sas_topology_mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(port_info, n, &ioc->sas_topology, list) {
>  
> -		if (port_info->phy_info &&

If I remember rightly this check is necessary because phy_info can be
NULL in certain situations.  Your patch will trip this to oops.  What
your description needs to say is that we no longer need to check this
pointer for NULL because it was checked somewhere else in the stack ...
but I can't see where that is, where is it?

> -		    (!(port_info->phy_info[0].identify.device_info &
> -		    MPI_SAS_DEVICE_INFO_SMP_TARGET)))
> +		if (!(port_info->phy_info[0].identify.device_info &
> +		    MPI_SAS_DEVICE_INFO_SMP_TARGET))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (mptsas_sas_expander_pg0(ioc, &buffer,

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ