[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081013105559.15ccb67f@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:55:59 -0400
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [kerneloops] regression in 2.6.27 wrt "lock_page" and the
"hwclock" program
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestion how to nicely implement "don't schedule me out"?
>
> There's nothing you can do. If you take a page fault, you're done.
> Forget about any "can't schedule" or "don't enable interrupts". The
> kernel _has_ to handle the page fault, and that may involve IO and
> thus random pauses. No ifs, buts or maybe's about it.
>
> This patch may or may not get rid of the warning, at least. It won't
> fix hwclock, but that's apparently unfixable from the kernel - the
> thing is just plain buggy.
it almost sounds like it's trying to do something that ... really the
kernel should be doing.
Karel: Can you describe what it WANTS to do so we can see if we can
just extend the linux kernel to do that the right way?
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists