[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810131017030.3288@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] intermediate SCSI updates
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> This represents all the pieces of SCSI which were depending on the
> already merged block tree.
Grr. And it doesn't actually compile.
drivers/scsi/sd.c:579:27: error: macro "sd_dif_op" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function ‘sd_prep_fn’:
drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: ‘sd_dif_op’ undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/scsi/sd.c:578: error: for each function it appears in.)
Hmm? Was this testedt AT ALL? It can never compile unless that idiotic
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY option is set that no sane person would set right
now, and which is even documented to not be enabled by default:
If in doubt, say N.
yet it looks like it has not compiled since a commit that was put in in
the middle of September!
What part of "This is total untested crap" are we missing here?
Yeah, I'm grumpy. I expect to not be fed shit like this. It has apparently
been rebased several times, and all apparently with no testing
what-so-ever!
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists