[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F3C060.2050302@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:40:48 -0400
From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@...il.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
CC: Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>,
video4linux-list@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] video: simplify cx18_get_input() and ivtv_get_input()
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2008 22:54:06 Németh Márton wrote:
>> From: Márton Németh <nm127@...email.hu>
>>
>> The cx18_get_input() and ivtv_get_input() are called
>> once from the VIDIOC_ENUMINPUT ioctl() and once from
>> the *_log_status() functions. In the first case the
>> struct v4l2_input is already filled with zeros,
>> so doing this again is unnecessary.
>
> And in the second case no one cares whether the struct is zeroed. And
> the same situation is also true for ivtv_get_output().
Yeah, 'cos there's nothing better than uninitialized fields, like the
recent report of a control that returns minimum and maximum values of
zero, but a step-size of 9. Why are we optimizing code paths that are
not performance critical by uninitializing memory?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists