[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq163nwcf02.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:22:05 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] intermediate SCSI updates
>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
Linus> What I'm upset about is that this has apparently gotten not
Linus> even some trivial testing of the _default_ build. I'm not
Linus> talking about any odd config options here. I'm literally
Linus> talking about the only _sane_ config option case.
This one initially slipped through my testing, sorry about that. I
always compile with the integrity both on and off in my devel tree but
I messed up while rebasing the patches against James' tree. These
mutually dependent block and SCSI merges are always tricky to deal
with.
However, I wonder why the obvious build fix wasn't merged? Mike
Anderson sent out a patch for this right after my patch appeared in
the SCSI tree...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists