[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081013.003441.109866647.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: swivel@...lls.gnugeneration.com
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
> From: swivel@...lls.gnugeneration.com
> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:45:57 -0500
>
> > I will be testing this patch today. At a glance it appears with this
> > patch we're still not taking rcvlowat into consideration in recv()
> > with MSG_PEEK flag set. This should probably also be corrected, as
> > mentioned in the thread previously.
>
> Yes, I remember you mentioning that.
>
> I'll look into it.
Were you able to test my updated patch?
If it makes your application work, I might want to defer messing around
with MSG_PEEK semantics in recvmsg().
So I've been waiting for your test results before I proceed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists