[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810131047.12748.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:47:12 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: Linux PPC devel <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks
Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2008 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
>
> > if (--hp->count == 0) {
> > - if (hp->ops->notifier_del)
> > - hp->ops->notifier_del(hp, hp->data);
> > -
> > /* We are done with the tty pointer now. */
> > hp->tty = NULL;
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
> >
> > + if (hp->ops->notifier_del)
> > + hp->ops->notifier_del(hp, hp->data);
> > +
>
> I will try. Of course the risk here is that the interrupt happens
> after we set hp->tty to NULL, so we probably need to check within the
> interrupt handler for a NULL tty. I haven't checked if that's the case
> (I'm not in front of the code right now).
Even the old code (without my patch) was setting hp->tty to NULL before doing
the irq_free, so that should be ok.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists