[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <912ec82a0810130228m3e9e11bcyfcabe1ab46fb0b6b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:28:23 +0200
From: "Neshama Parhoti" <pneshama@...il.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: section mismatch with a platform driver
Hi Adrian and thank you for the help!
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:19:05AM +0200, Neshama Parhoti wrote:
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x44bc4): Section mismatch: reference to
>> .init.text:my_probe_func (between 'my_platform_struct' and
>> 'debug_level_variable')
>>
>> If I understand correctly, it shouts about my probe function being
>> referenced from the data section:
>>
>> static struct platform_driver my_platform_struct = {
>> .probe = my_probe_func,
>> .remove = my_remove,
>> .suspend = my_suspend,
>> .resume = my_resume,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> },
>> };
>>
> It complains about "my_probe_func", and that's not even in the code
> you posted.
It happens even if I use an empty function like this:
static int __init my_probe_func(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
return 0;
}
any idea what's the problem ?
thanks again!
pnesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists