[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081014134249.GA5611@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:42:49 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>, gadiyar@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] HDQ Driver for OMAP2430/3430
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:50:02AM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
> I think it's reasonable to permit the driver's operations to be interrupted
> in this manner. It's done in quite a few other places. But the problem is
> actually *testing* it.
Why not just skipping the waiting and returning error pretending user
really sent a signal?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists