[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440810141011w3f5774eaxf6dd02abcc87b629@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:11:14 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: nico@...ir.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB problem on x86_64: nommu_map_single() issue?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:05:39 +0200
> Nicolas Bareil <nico@...ir.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 08:00:09PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> > > > Is this a regression? Did it work on earlier kernels?
>> > >
>> > > Yes this is a regression: USB works in 2.6.26.x with (almost) the same configuration.
>> >
>> > With old kernels, you can find something like the following line in
>> > the boot log?
>> >
>> > PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
>>
>> Indeed, I have this line:
>>
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] Calgary: Unable to locate Rio Grande table in EBDA - bailing!
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] Placing software IO TLB between 0x4000000 - 0x8000000
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] Memory: 4055544k/4980736k available (2225k kernel code, 138092k reserved, 1079k data, 392k init)
>> Oct 14 12:46:29 brew kernel: [ 0.004000] CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated
>
> Probably, the changes to the initial memory setup code breaks the
> following code:
>
> void __init pci_swiotlb_init(void)
> {
> /* don't initialize swiotlb if iommu=off (no_iommu=1) */
> if (!iommu_detected && !no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN)
> swiotlb = 1;
>
>
> SWIOTLB should be used for your box but somehow pci-nommu is used.
>
>
>> The whole kern.log and my config are available here :
>> http://chdir.org/~nbareil/kern.log
>
> The following part in the 2.6.27 boot log looks suspicious:
>
> Oct 13 15:43:48 brew kernel: last_pfn = 0x130000 max_arch_pfn = 0x3ffffffff
that is max_pfn
> Oct 13 15:43:48 brew kernel: x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> Oct 13 15:43:48 brew kernel: last_pfn = 0xcffc2 max_arch_pfn = 0x3ffffffff
that is max_low_pfn
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists