linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:43:12 -0700 (PDT)

> The proper way to test for whether an interrupt is valid or not is to do
> 
> 	if (dev->irq) {
> 		...
> 
> and no other. There is no spoon. That NO_IRQ was insane. And architectures 
> or drivers that still think otherwise should fix themselves.

Agreed.  Someone tried to add something similar to the network
driver phylib layer, and I told them similarly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/