linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6 v3] PCI: document the change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081014044626.GB25780@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:46:26 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>
Cc:	"Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 v3] PCI: document the change

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:18:40PM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:14:35AM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> >> As Eddie said, we have two problems here:
> >> 1) User has to set device specific parameters of a VF
> >> when he wants to use this VF with KVM (assign this
> >> device to KVM guest). In this case, 
> >> VF driver is not loaded in the host environment. So
> >> operations which 
> >> are implemented as driver callback (e.g.
> >> set_mac_address()) are not supported.
> > 
> > I suspect what you want to do is create, then configure
> > the device in the host, then assign it to the guest.
> 
> That is not true. Rememver the created VFs will be destroyed no matter
> for PF power event or error recovery conducted reset.
> So what we want is:
> 
> Config, create, assign, and then deassign and destroy and then
> recreate...

Yes, but my point is this all happens in the _host_, not in the _guest_.

> Sorry can u explain a little bit more? The SR-IOV patch won't define
> what kind of entries should be created or not, we leave network
> subsystem to decide what to do. Same for disk subsstem etc.

No entries should be created.  This needs to be not SR-IOV specific.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/