[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081015110157.GA24363@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:01:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:33:19AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> hm:
> Author: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri Oct 10 15:58:14 2008 +0100
> Commit: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
> CommitDate: Mon Oct 13 21:51:56 2008 +0100
> if a patch is merged as agressively as that, it should at minimum be
> tested a bit.
It has been tested (I've got some systems here that rely on the WM8350
fairly heavily) - what was missing was cross platform testing on
architectures that don't define NO_IRQ. The code is rather older than
the dates indicate due to some rearrangement of the patch series, though
obviously out of tree stuff has to be taken with a grain of salt.
Anyway, I've posted a patch removing the use of NO_IRQ from the driver
(as <1224066054-24401-1-git-send-email-broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>)
which should hopefully be merged shortly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists