[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fb8beea82becda1567755f13aab4c11@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:55:17 -0400
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...nedhand.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Don't use NO_IRQ in WM8350
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:20:54 +0100, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> NO_IRQ is only defined on some architectures - the general way to test
> for an invalid IRQ in the modern kernel is by comparing with zero.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Applied, thanks.
I'll send a pull request to Linus soon.
Cheers,
Samuel.
> ---
>
> This is a build fix for platforms that don't define NO_IRQ (which is
> most of them). Please merge as soon as possible.
>
> drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> index 25a7a5d..bf87f67 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> @@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ int wm8350_device_init(struct wm8350 *wm8350, int
> irq,
>
> mutex_init(&wm8350->irq_mutex);
> INIT_WORK(&wm8350->irq_work, wm8350_irq_worker);
> - if (irq != NO_IRQ) {
> + if (irq) {
> ret = request_irq(irq, wm8350_irq, 0,
> "wm8350", wm8350);
> if (ret != 0) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists