[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F5DFF7.9010908@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:20:07 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] ide: add ->set_irq method
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add ->set_irq method for setting nIEN bit of ATA Device Control
> register and use it instead of ide_set_irq().
>
> While at it:
>
> * Use ->set_irq in init_irq() and do_reset1().
>
> * Don't use HWIF() macro in ide_check_pm_state().
>
> There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>
[...]
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,23 @@ static u8 ide_read_sff_dma_status(ide_hw
> return inb(hwif->dma_base + ATA_DMA_STATUS);
> }
>
> +static void ide_set_irq(ide_hwif_t *hwif, int on)
> +{
> + u8 ctl = ATA_DEVCTL_OBS;
> +
> + if (on == 4) { /* hack for SRST */
> + ctl |= 4;
> + on &= ~4;
> + }
> +
> + ctl |= on ? 0 : 2;
> +
> + if (hwif->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_MMIO)
> + writeb(ctl, (void __iomem *)hwif->io_ports.ctl_addr);
> + else
> + outb(ctl, hwif->io_ports.ctl_addr);
> +}
> +
> static void ide_tf_load(ide_drive_t *drive, ide_task_t *task)
> {
> ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
>
[...]
> @@ -1162,16 +1180,15 @@ static ide_startstop_t do_reset1 (ide_dr
> * immediate interrupt due to the edge transition it produces.
> * This single interrupt gives us a "fast poll" for drives that
> * recover from reset very quickly, saving us the first 50ms wait time.
> + *
> + * TODO: add ->softreset method and stop abusing ->set_irq
> */
> /* set SRST and nIEN */
> - hwif->OUTBSYNC(hwif, ATA_DEVCTL_OBS | 6, io_ports->ctl_addr);
> + hwif->set_irq(hwif, 4);
> /* more than enough time */
> udelay(10);
It seems to me that the whole idea of having 2 separate methods for
writing the single device control register is a wrong idea.
I'm suggesting to convert set_irq() method to write_devctrl() method and
pass the register value directly to it.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists