[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081016073749.4f944a19@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:37:49 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, ego@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu, andi@...stfloor.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: Timer migration
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:12:39 +0530
>
>
> Here's a brief introduction as to why we need timer migration.
>
as I've said before, for reducing power consumption I don't buy into
needing this concept....
If you have high frequency timers, you've lost no matter what (and we
fixed almost all of them in the ecosystem); if you don't have those
then this patch doesn't really add anything.
(and the range-hrtimers fixes the intermediate state)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists