lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:26:19 +0200
From: markus reichelt <ml@...eichelt.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
* Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version
> numbers all the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering
> scheme is a pain a times. How about this proposal instead?
Why not just keep it? It has worked so far, and from a strictly
end-user point of view I cannot see any advantages at all with a new
scheme. The ideas mentioned so far don't cut it either.
Just my heretic 2 cents,
S.
PS: Nice timing, thunderstorm approaching.
--
In Russia, President kills Financial Crisis
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists