linux-kernel - Re: Stack dump from GIT HEAD if CONFIG_ATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48F6B8D0.7090307@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:45:20 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stack dump from GIT HEAD if CONFIG_ATA_SFF is not set

Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc linux-ide)
> 
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:25:30 -0700 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote:
>> I am using kernel 2.6.27-Linus-03151-g4480f15b-dirty. On booting a system built
>> with CONFIG_ATA_SFF not set, the following appears in my dmesg output. The
>> "dirtiness" of the kernel is due to some code included to trace down messages
>> coming from the usb system, and is not involved here. If CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y, the
>> message does not appear. From Google results, it seems that this parameter
>> should be set for most systems, but one should get clean runs without it.

Yeap, working on it.  It seems SFF/BMDMA support needs to be separated
out further.

Thanks for the report.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/