linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SiS55x, another x86 CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810162050150.7314@sko.w0.dk>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:01:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Hans Schou <linux@...ou.dk>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SiS55x, another x86 CPU

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>> I think time is up for getting rid of Pine and there stupid license. I'll
>> check if "nail" can handle attachment correctly.
>
> alpine?

Well, Gentoo didn't have it and it is probably a "wrong" license.

> But, why do you send patches as attachments in the first place?

Ingo said I could do so when it was something to do with x86 patches.
Anyway, it looks like ^R in Pine did work correctly.

> It's recommended to _not_ do that, for easier review.

OK.

> Pine can handle that fine since ages (I switched from elm to pine 13 or
> so years ago).

Yes, my so called friends have been bullying me for that long with the Pine 
license. Mutt is not an option either.

/hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/