linux-kernel - Re: no way to swapoff a deleted swap file?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810162313570.26758@blonde.site>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:38:09 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	Peter Cordes <peter@...des.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: no way to swapoff a deleted swap file?

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:21 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
> > I unlinked a swapfile without realizing I was still swapping on it.
> > Now my /proc/swaps looks like this:
> > Filename                                Type            Size    Used	Priority
> > /var/tmp/EXP/cache/swap/1\040(deleted)  file            1288644 1448	-1
> > /var/tmp/EXP/cache/swap/2\040(deleted)  file            1433368 0	-2
> > 
> >  AFAICT, there's nothing I can pass to swapoff(2) that will make the
> > kernel let go of them.  If that's the case, please consider this a
> > feature request for a way to do this.  Now I'm going to have to reboot
> > before I can mkfs that partition.
> > 
> >  If kswapd0 had a fd open on the swap files, swapoff /proc/$PID/fd/3
> > could possibly work.  But it looks like the files are open but with no
> > user-space accessable file descriptors to them.  Which makes sense,
> > except for this case.
> 
> Right, except that kswapd is per node, so we'd either have to add it to
> all kswapd instances or a random one. Also, kthreads don't seem to have
> a files table afaict.
> 
> But yes, I see your problem and it makes sense to look for a nice
> solution.

No immediate answer springs to my mind.

It's not something I'd want to add a new system call for.
I guess we could put a magic file for each swap area
somewhere down in /sys, and allow swapoff to act upon that.

If there were other good reasons to add such files, that
could make sense.  But although I'll willingly admit it's a
lacuna, I don't think it's one worth bloating the kernel for.

(I would suggest that Peter keep a second link to his swapfiles
somewhere safer; but that's then open to the converse complaint,
that when he unlinks intentionally but forgets the safe link,
the disk space remains mysteriously in use.)

Sorry for being unhelpful!
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/