linux-kernel - Re: trivial patches: Should we care about control reaches end of non-void function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081016060829.GA21294@steve.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:08:29 +0100
From:	Steve Kemp <steve@...ve.org.uk>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: trivial patches: Should we care about control reaches end of
	non-void function

On Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 23:26:25 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> Probably better to mark BUG() properly for the compiler.

  Good idea.

  It seems this was attempted previously:

     http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0402.0/0843.html

  The patch needs some updating to move it into the current location,
 but passes a compile test at least.

Steve
-- 
Managed Anti-Spam Service
http://mail-scanning.com/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/