[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081017113234.GC18284@x200.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:32:34 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:26:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:18 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:06:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:56 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:47:51AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > >...
> > > > > > Packages are built in a chroot with the correct release installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then why would this break if they are being built against the correct,
> > > > > older, kernel?
> > > >
> > > > How could you build userspace "against a kernel"?
> > > >
> > > > sys_*uname() returns the version of the running kernel.
> > >
> > > We have a uts namespace, you can make the thing return whatever well you
> > > please.
> >
> > Hostname, domainname, what else?
>
> Can't it fake the version number? -
It can, but is there a system call for this?
> sounds like a useful feature :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists