[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810171405.46523.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:05:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Suspend/resume regression between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27-rc1
On Friday, 17 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 16 of October 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > >
> > > The patches between the above two commits are related with X86. When
> > > using git-bisect between the above two commits, we will get the
> > > compiling errors(For example: some files don't exist) or the kernel
> > > panic. So we can't continue using git-bisect to identify which commit
> > > the regression is caused by.
> >
> > If you test SMP kernels on a non-SMP box, that may be
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568. In which case, please test
> > the patch from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46 .
> >
> Thanks for so quick response. The smp kernel is tested on the non-SMP
> box.
> After applying the patch in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568#c46,
> the box can be resumed very well on the latest kernel.
Thanks for testing.
The patch has been posted for mainline inclusion:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122419938208201&w=4
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists