[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081017133750.GL19428@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:37:50 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for October 16 - softlockup detected at blk_invoke_request_fn
On Sat, Oct 18 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:57:55 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm guessing it's a merge mess in linux-next. I tried to look at the
> > diff, but it was pretty much impossible to read and even included lots
> > of things in -git already.
>
> If you are looking at the linux-next patch on kernel.org, then it is
> relative to 2.6.27, so will contain a lot of stuff in Linus' tree. Its
> purpose is to allow people to recreate the linux-next tree from a kernel
> tarball.
>
> In the linux-next git tree, the point in Linus' tree that it is based on
> the the "stable" branch. If necessary, people should be able to bisect
> between the "stabel" and "master" branches of a linux-next tree. Or, I
> am told, between one linux-next tree and another (but that sounds painful
> to me).
OK, I'll try the -git tree next time I have to lookup changes in -next.
Thanks for the explanation!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists